Talking with GameIndustry.biz, Splinter Cell Conviction producer Mathieu Ferland talks about the game revealing that he and the Ubisoft team truly believe in the new direction they are taking their stealth based franchise. In Conviction Ubisoft is switching it up by allowing players to play a different Sam Fisher who's running from the law, blending in with crowds in broad daylight, and using distraction techniques to complete missions. This ultimately changes up gameplay and strays a little bit from the proven successful Splinter Cell formula. Ferland says that they've "been working very closely with the fans from the beginning" and thinks that Conviction will be a welcomed changed to the franchise. But Ferland also let it be known that that Ubisoft is not afraid to go back to its old stealth formula if Conviction were to flop. But for now, they're confident.As fans of the Splinter Cell franchise, do you think Conviction is a creative step in the right direction to expand the storyline and freshen up gameplay? Or are you dead set on being a shadows assassin and reject Sam Fisher's new hobo look?





Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
5-29-2007 @ 2:36PM
Toph said...
I've played the past few Splinter Cell games, and I didn't exactly love most of them. Conviction on the other hand looks just right for me! Can't wait to play it. I'm excited to try it out!
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 2:36PM
Teabag said...
Can't be said. Ubisoft makes good games mostly and i have full faith in them. Conviction also sounds interesting and looks brilliant....but what we see can be a sham sometimes.
Time will tell.
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 2:40PM
ProjectEkim360 said...
Lurking in the shadows is fun but how many times can you do it over and over again SC DA was pretty good but i think conviction will livin up gameplay
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 2:48PM
gibber9583 said...
I am slightly nervous that Ubi may not include a multiplayer mode. Has there been any news on this?
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 3:02PM
Tim said...
There will be a multiplayer mode.
The story arc has to be coming to a close at this point. His daughter is dead, he has pretty much nothing left. And I guess Third Echelon is corrupt and he's bringing it down in Conviction?
I'd like to see a prequel to the first Splinter Cell. Perhaps the first few missions are during his time as a Navy Seal (opening up co-op gameplay options) and then transitions into the stealth style of the first game while the story covers how he became an operative in third echelon.
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 3:08PM
Paulish said...
I believe it's a creative step in the right direction. It's smart that they're trying to inject something new into the Splinter Cell world. There's only so many times you can hide in the shadows and wait to attack. It gets boring after a while. With Conviction, it's a whole new atmosphere that I'm pretty interested in getting my hands on.
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 3:36PM
Chris said...
Definitely sounds good.
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 3:38PM
Benjamin09 said...
I loved these games, but I just could not get into SC DA at all. It is still sitting there...waiting for me to pick it up and finish it. So I welcome a change in the game.
Three cheers for Ubisoft!
Hip hip hurray!....
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 3:46PM
Josh said...
Looks great so far...I'll be picking it up if it continues to look this interesting. I've always been a fan of the Splinter Cell series but I welcome the new venture that Ubisoft is presenting. If it plays anything like the Borne Identity movies I'll be all over it.
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 3:56PM
Jay said...
I don't mind a new direction, I hope it is good though. I'd also like to see Splinter Cell going back to its roots soon, weather or not this concept is successful.
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 4:46PM
Ransom said...
Well given the story line of double agent it would be good to start off conviction with him swimming ashore from the boat at the end of Double Agent in the city with the agency disavowing him or compromised and trying to regain his identity. Not a stretch since DA started off with Sam breaking out of jail.
Could be a good change, Ill play to find out, but I could see how the gameplay changes might not work so well for multiplayer.
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 4:49PM
ron said...
I love the idea Tim has of a prequel. A young Sam Fisher as a Seal, or just joining the Third Echelon. How cool would that be. As for the new direction, I know I would miss sneaking around in the shadows, but then again, with all the graphics improvements, it would be a nice change to actually be able to see the surroundings in broad daylight.
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 5:06PM
THA1icarus said...
I think they r puting sort of the same gameplay as they have in Assassins Creed in this new Splinter Cell, that could be a good thing. But just give me Assassins Creed that is a nice mix of the new S.C. and Prins of Persia.
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 5:40PM
Morgon said...
So they're banking on a slightly different form of a modern-day Assassin's Creed, then?
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 7:31PM
That 1 Dude said...
I'm all for the change. Frankly, the franchise had been getting a bit stale of late. I didn't even play the last one, and from what I read that was pretty much a change of pace too.
Seems to me, they know the franchise has been getting stale for a while and they tried to subtley change things up last time around. It didn't work all that well, and this time they are fully embracing change.
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 7:46PM
Grunt420 said...
only the first splinter cell was good...
Reply
5-29-2007 @ 10:27PM
Drdre74 said...
I'll just wait on Assassins Creed instead since it seems like the same game just lesss fun.
Reply
5-30-2007 @ 3:01AM
snsr said...
This is an interesting, creative turn for the series. New territory for gaming, too; I've never played a game like this before.
This may be my most anticipated game at the moment.
Reply
5-30-2007 @ 6:32AM
BowserUSC said...
I think its about time for a change. I liked the first one because it was very innovative and looked cool, but I got bored of it quickly, never even finished it.
Reply
5-30-2007 @ 9:09AM
Boff said...
Smells of Assassin's Creed to me.
Ubisoft are doing that one too aren't they?
Someone must have thought it was easier just to use the engine and call it Splinter Cell did they?
Seems strange that they would bring out an 'innovative' new game (Assassin's) then bring out another that sounds exactly the same!!
Reply