1. Thats unbelievable, i liked the update about the call of duty 4 being like 54 or something like that but 64 is even better, and the game looks unbelievable. Lets hope this game studio has tons of goood servers to keep are games going strong the whole time.
NO LAG!!!

Posted at 12:45PM on Jan 19th 2007 by Lance Minielly

2. It'll be interesting. Got to see what the latency will be for a full 64 man war, tho.

Posted at 12:45PM on Jan 19th 2007 by Jonah Falcon

3. *rubs eyes*

... wah?!

Posted at 12:57PM on Jan 19th 2007 by Frosty22

4. now thats what im talking about!!!

Posted at 1:04PM on Jan 19th 2007 by drunkenshaolin

5. Yes. But.. what about the servers? Will it be run by EA.. I hope not. Those are always wrought with problems.

Posted at 1:18PM on Jan 19th 2007 by Cor-El

6. That is so awesome.. I can't wait to hear more about this game.. Its one of the most anticipated for me.... I hope more developers do this as well... I love games like this and BF:MC and hopefully will see more.. The game I want to see though is one that actually means something. Basically Chromehounds meets Battlefield, where every battle means something towards winning the overall war... Now that would kick ass.

Posted at 1:18PM on Jan 19th 2007 by Joe Mamma

7. perfect dark was 32 players and had you hosting your own games. I could host a 32 player match with my 800mbit up connection just fine. I still fine with no lag. Its the game with the best net code to date. Lets hope they can make a 64 man lag free experiance.

Posted at 1:34PM on Jan 19th 2007 by Mike

8. The maps need to be rather huge. 16 person matches in Lost Planet often results in instant spawn kills because there's so many people confined to one area. 64 people on maps the size of Lost Planet would be unplayable. They'd have to have maps roughly 4x the size if not larger to make it actually fun to play. No sense in spawning and having a team of 8 people pouding your ass into the dirt constantly. That's not my idea of fun.

Posted at 2:24PM on Jan 19th 2007 by w0rddriven

9. Published by THQ, so it gets a tenative thumbs up from me.

Posted at 3:16PM on Jan 19th 2007 by J.Goodwin

10. I hope the servers are run by EA.. I like the was Battlefield is handled... Sure you might betting booted here or there, but its better than some guy just ending a game.

Posted at 3:21PM on Jan 19th 2007 by Joe Mamma

11. u fire your gun and 5 minutes later you end up face down in the dirt because someone whcked you on the back of the head seconds before your shot.

lag-tacular!

Posted at 4:23PM on Jan 19th 2007 by JRock3x8 - 2o2p

12. step in the right direction for xboxlive. 16 player matches were done on the original xbox. next gen should mean more. and yes this gets my $ attention.

Posted at 6:33PM on Jan 19th 2007 by evil

13. Now we don't have to listen to Sony fanboys go on about how the 360 can't do 40 player MP like the PS3.

Posted at 12:01AM on Jan 20th 2007 by Freakin\' Pothead

14. Xbox had 50 player games didn't it? Black hawk down was the game I think...

Posted at 4:40PM on Jan 21st 2007 by GT = stoneNbone420