
Of course, the only real question is which 45 songs will be appearing in the game. Feel free to post your favorites in the comments.
[Via Joystiq]
Name | Date |
---|---|
Fallout 3 |
Oct 28 |
MotoGP 08 |
Oct 28 |
Scene It? Box Office Smash |
Oct 28 |
Score International: Baja 1000 |
Oct 28 |
Madagascar 2 |
Nov 4 |
EndWar |
Nov 4 |
High School Musical 3 |
Nov 4 |
History Channel Civil War: Secret Missions |
Nov 4 |
Secret Service: Ultimate Sacrifice |
Nov 4 |
James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace |
Nov 4 |
Legendary |
Nov 4 |
NPPL Championship Paintball 2009 |
Nov 4 |
Namco Museum Virtual Arcade |
Nov 4 |
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
![]()
|
![]()
|
![]()
|
|
![]()
|
![]()
|
![]()
|
![]()
|
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
10-31-2008 @ 4:03PM
JerkfacedFed said...
what a stupid idea from the consumer's point of view, i want beatles songs but id never buy a game full of them only...
i see how paul mccartny wants all the licensing profits to himself, but his selfishness will lead to poor sales just like the metallica and aerosmith games
Reply
10-31-2008 @ 4:14PM
Ozzpot said...
Poor sales of the Metallica and Aerosmith games? The Metallica one hasn't even been made yet!.. and everyone I know is buying it when it is.
I don't like the Beatles, so I won't be buying this game, but I'm sure lots of people will. If you don't like it, don't buy it. Why would it's very existence annoy you so much?
10-31-2008 @ 4:36PM
DeadPlasmaCell said...
WTF? Poor sales?? GH: Metallica isn't even out yet and that's going to be a guaranteed hit. The Guitar Hero: Aerosmith game made more than $25 million and sold more than half a million copies. I wouldn't say those are poor sales.. That being said, I do like The Beatles, but I think this is going to be a snoozer, game-play wise. It's still going to be a big success though regardless.
11-01-2008 @ 2:49PM
JerkfacedFed said...
my whole point is that i do not agree with this over commercialization and exploitation, stop defending the big company who is fucking you out of $60 just for beatles songs.
10-31-2008 @ 4:12PM
SaNcTuS said...
Don't Let Me Down, Strawberry Fields Forever, While My Guitar Gently Weeps, I am the walrus, lucy in the sky with diamonds, Across the universe, Yesterday, Happiness is a warm gun, dig a pony, i got a feeling, I want you(this song would be awesome!), get back, hello goodbye are just a few off the top of my head that would be awesome for the game. I hope they have Abbey Road/Let It Be song's on the game since the songs are just from '62-'69
Reply
10-31-2008 @ 4:20PM
Musicman247 said...
Paperback Writer and Day Tripper
Reply
10-31-2008 @ 4:24PM
Pos said...
They suck!! Whats next a Elvis game? THEY ARE DEAD FOR A REASON!!!! So they can SHTFU!!
Reply
10-31-2008 @ 4:29PM
webster1990 said...
You sir,
are a tosser
10-31-2008 @ 4:47PM
Zoot Suit Jedi said...
Finally. Someone I can see eye to eye with on this one.
The Beatles were only as good as thier marketing made the masses believe.
I am not drinking that kool-aid.
10-31-2008 @ 5:37PM
Mikemyerz666 said...
the beatles helped start everything that we have today in terms of music. Every band out there has learned something from the beatles, elvis too. You're just a small minded fuck that doesn't know what music is all about, go listen to some more of that mariah carey i'm sure you're down with who doesn't right her own songs.
10-31-2008 @ 6:20PM
Richard Mitchell said...
You're right. All that Beatles marketing that swamped the airwaves when I was in my teens during the 1990s is what made me like them.
10-31-2008 @ 7:41PM
Triforceowner said...
I agree with Richard. I am seventeen and love the Beatles. Classic rock is so contrary to the current marketing teens experience, yet it thrives so well in our demographic.
10-31-2008 @ 11:22PM
Zoot Suit Jedi said...
Sad, fellas. Really.
If you pathetic bastards knew thing one about music you would realize that Pink Floyd, The Rolling Stones and Hendrix were all making better music at the time that still influences rock and roll to this day. Go ahead. Look at the discographies. But because the Beatles were "cute" they received more credit.
11-01-2008 @ 1:14AM
cranium said...
while i'm sure you haters think that liking something because everyone else does is lame, I just hope you know that not liking something because everyone else does is worse.
'stones' 'pink floyd' 'hendrix'.. could you have a more generic argument? throw the grateful dead in there too while you're at it. tooools
10-31-2008 @ 4:24PM
dicknjane said...
I Wanna Hold Your Hand
Reply
10-31-2008 @ 4:29PM
webster1990 said...
Eleanor Rigby
Reply
10-31-2008 @ 4:31PM
M@ said...
In My Life would be great when they get the keyboard accessory out on the market.
And Revolution 9 would be great when they get the acid accessory out on the market.
Other than that, I think the earlier half of the catalogue will be more fun to play, although the drums will be a little boring. Ringo didn't really learn to play until about '66...
Reply
10-31-2008 @ 5:46PM
Mikemyerz666 said...
lmao, the acid accessory, good one
10-31-2008 @ 4:33PM
jcat1118 said...
While My Guitar Gently Weeps, Why Don't We Do It in the Road?, Happiness Is A Warm Gun & Eleanor Rigby
Reply
10-31-2008 @ 4:42PM
SadisticHam said...
I always view The Beatles, Elvis and other massive hits from way back when that i consider shite as only getting the fame they did because, at the time, there was a lack of music compared to today.
I'm not saying they'd not make it big but in this day and age if they started out new, they'd not get anywhere near the level of success, still this has nothing to do with the game, i just wanted an excuse to call them shite.
And god damn do their accents piss me off and this is coming from a British guy.
Reply