
First, it's great that EA is giving a chance to an independent podcast like GTR. It gives hope to other indie sites that don't have the budgets of bigger sites. However, there is also plenty of room for concern. In the right circumstances, a company could easily expect a sponsored website to paint a rosy picture of its games or products, even if it doesn't explicitly say so. For example, imagine if Nyko sponsored someone: "The Intercooler 2.0 rawked our sawks off!" You get the idea. We're not saying we know of any such instances, but the possibility is a little frightening. Now, we know Godfree and everyone at GTR. They're being perfectly up front about EA's sponsorship, realize the implications, and will in no way give EA special treatment.
It's exciting that independent news sources are getting a shot at E3, but it leaves us wary. We can only hope that future sponsors and those they sponsor are as honest as GTR. We have to ask, what do you think of the idea of corporate sponsorship for E3?
1. it's no different from companies that fly independent sites out for community day events. what's so big about it? it being E3 i suppose?
good they don't have to pay. but it's just a plane ticket and hotel. unless EA is also letting them use their cameras, equipment etc. it's just a plane ticket to E3.
no reason to hate. no reason to think they'll give EA special treatment. EA has been doing this for a while now..buying independent sites tickets to cover events...not as big as E3 but they've always done it.
Posted at 3:29PM on Jun 29th 2007 by DatBoy